Hampton Bays Water District v. The 3M Company et al
| Hampton Bays Water District |
| Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, National Foam, Inc., Chemguard Inc., The 3M Company and Tyco Fire Products L.P. |
| 2:2018cv01996 |
| April 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joan M. Azrack |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine A. Armstrong on behalf of Tyco Fire Products L.P. (notification declined or already on case) (Armstrong, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas E. Fleming on behalf of Tyco Fire Products L.P. (aty to be noticed) (Fleming, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Tyco Fire Products L.P. (Armstrong, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Tyco Fire Products L.P. from Supreme Court Suffolk County, case number 603477/2018. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10324263) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Verified Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons and Verified Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Chemguard Inc. Consent to Removal, #4 Exhibit D - Buckeye Fire Equipment Company Consent to Removal, #5 Exhibit E - National Foam, Inc. Consent to Removal, #6 Exhibit F - 3M Company Consent to Removal) (Armstrong, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
