Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc. v. Ding et al
| Oogie Art Long Island Inc., Oogie Art Long Island Inc. doing business as Art Portfolio Center also known as Jane Ding Art School, Jane Ding and Jane Ding Art School |
| Jing Ding |
| Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc. and Shu H. Yang |
| 2:2018cv02079 |
| April 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc., Shu H. Yang, by Jing Ding. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 6/28/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Joan M. Azrack in Courtroom 920 of the Long Island Courthouse. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se defendant. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 5/29/2018. (Posillico, Lauren)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER OF RECUSAL: I hereby recuse myself from the above-caption case. Judge Arthur D. Spatt recused. Case reassigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack for all further proceedings. SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 5/23/2018. c/m to pro se defendant. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 14
Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT: It appearing from the docket maintained in this action that defendant Oogie Art Long Island Inc. has failed to appear or otherwise defend this action, the default of defendant Oogie Art Long Island Inc. is hereby noted pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Toritto, Jim)
|
|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER: On May 17, 2018, the pro se Defendant Jing Ding (Ding) attempted to file an answer on behalf of the corporate Defendant Oogie Art Long Island Inc. (Oogie). The Court cannot accept Dings answer on behalf of Oogie. A corporate defendant may only be represented by counsel, and therefore only counsel may speak on a corporate defendants behalf. Additionally, the Court notes that if Ding is unable to secure counsel for Oogie, the corporate defendant will be held in default, and judgment may be entered against it. It is So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 5/18/2018. c/m to defendant at address on return of service. (Attachments: #1 Copy of undocketed returned Answer) (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 12
ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, COUNTERCLAIM against Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc. by Jing Ding. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 11
Request for Certificate of Default by Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Lin, #2 Exhibit A: Complaint, #3 Exhibit B: Affidavit of Service Jing Ding, #4 Exhibit C: Affidavit of Service Oogie Art Long Island Inc., #5 Proposed Order) (Lin, David)
|
|
Filing 10
LETTER dated 5/14/2018 from Pro Se Office to pro se litigant. The enclosed answer is being returned without docketing or consideration. Papers cannot be filed without indicating that they have been served on all parties in your action, or their attorneys. This office will not forward copies of your papers to other parties or their counsel. An affirmation of service form is enclosed. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc.. Oogie Art Long Island Inc. served on 4/25/2018, answer due 5/16/2018. (Mercer, Justin)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc.. Jing Ding served on 4/25/2018, answer due 5/16/2018. (Mercer, Justin)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Oogie Art Long Island Inc.. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jing Ding. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Summons. Re Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information., #1 Complaint, by Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Mercer, Justin)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Trademark. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Filing 3
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Filing 2
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Arthur D. Spatt and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Proposed summonses are rejected; the section that reads "The answer or motion must be served on plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are:" has not be completed; the Clerk's Office cannot issue the summonses. Counsel is advised to submit completed proposed summonses using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Jing Ding, Oogie Art Long Island Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10337255 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Ashcan Studio of Art, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B) (Mercer, Justin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
