Neurological Surgery, P.C. v. Aetna Health Inc. et al
| Neurological Surgery, P.C. |
| Aetna Health Inc. and Aetna Health Insurance Company of New York |
| 2:2018cv02167 |
| April 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Gary R Brown |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Aetna Health Inc., Aetna Health Insurance Company of New York. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Proposed Order) (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Aetna Health Inc., Aetna Health Insurance Company of New York from Supreme Court of the State of NY, County of Nassau, case number 613937/2017. Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D 1-100, #5 Exhibit D 101-199, #6 Exhibit D 200-299, #7 Exhibit D 300-428, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) Modified to correct the date of filing on 4/16/2018 (Cox, Dwayne). |
| FILING FEE: $ 150.00, receipt number 4653126796 re: #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Cox, Dwayne) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 4653126796 (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
