Kassman v. United States Office of Personal Management
Plaintiff: Shawn Kassman
Defendant: United States Office of Personal Management
Case Number: 2:2018cv02529
Filed: April 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Gary R Brown
Referring Judge: Arthur D Spatt
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2018 Filing 7 Minute Order for proceedings held before Judge Joanna Seybert: Show Cause Hearing held on 4/30/2018 withdrawing #4 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Case called. Application for T.R.O./Preliminary Injunction is withdrawn, as parties have settled this aspect of the case. Court Reporter: D. Tursi. (Valle, Christine)
April 30, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Russell Price on behalf of United States Office of Personal Management. (aty to be noticed) (Valle, Christine)
April 30, 2018 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne)
April 30, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Shawn Kassman. (Cox, Dwayne)
April 30, 2018 Filing 3 Proposed Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Shawn Kassman (Cox, Dwayne)
April 30, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States Office of Personal Management, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Cox, Dwayne)
April 30, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Office of Personal Management Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Shawn Kassman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne)
April 30, 2018 FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 25171 (Cox, Dwayne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kassman v. United States Office of Personal Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Kassman
Represented By: Robert W. Dapelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Office of Personal Management
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?