Iris Muro, As Trustee of the 2005 Muro Family Trust v. Muro
| Iris Muro, As Trustee of the 2005 Muro Family Trust |
| Edward Muro, III |
| 2:2018cv03223 |
| June 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven I Locke |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Defendant's Answer to Complaint served on Robert P. Lynn, Jr., Esq. Lynn, Gartner, Dunne & Covello, LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff, 330 Old Country Road, Suite 103, Mineola, New York 11501, on June 1, 2018, filed by Edward Muro, III. (McGowan, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by EDWARD MURO III. (McGowan, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by EDWARD MURO III from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, case number Index No. 606094/2018. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10475893) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No (Attachments: #1 Removal Action Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (McGowan, Thomas) Modified on 6/1/2018 (Rodin, Deanna). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Iris Muro, As Trustee of the 2005 Muro Family Trust v. Muro | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Iris Muro, As Trustee of the 2005 Muro Family Trust | |
| Represented By: | Robert P. Lynn, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Edward Muro, III | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. McGowan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
