Chen et al v. Posser
Plaintiff: Gee H. Chen and Piroska Chen
Defendant: John H. Posser
Case Number: 2:2018cv03384
Filed: June 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Arlene R Lindsay
Referring Judge: Arthur D Spatt
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to John H. Posser. (Flanagan, Doreen)
June 11, 2018 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
June 11, 2018 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen)
June 11, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John H. Posser Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Gee H. Chen, Piroska Chen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Flanagan, Doreen)
June 11, 2018 FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 0207-10497953 (Flanagan, Doreen)
June 11, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Arthur D. Spatt and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)
June 11, 2018 Incorrect Case Entry Information. Document Entry No. 1 (Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet and Proposed Summons) was entered as against All Plaintiffs. Deleted Document Entry No. 1 and re-entered as against Defendant. (Flanagan, Doreen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chen et al v. Posser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gee H. Chen
Represented By: Marc H. Wasserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Piroska Chen
Represented By: Marc H. Wasserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John H. Posser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?