US Bank v. Elardo et al
| US Bank and Moose & Moon Realty LLC |
| Catherine Salerno, CACH LLC, JST Capital Inc., Westcom Credit Union, Nassau County Clerk, Jean Elardo, Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund, People of the State of New York and Jim Flack Carpet Sales Inc. |
| 2:2018cv04063 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F Bianco |
| Steven I Locke |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Sarah K Hyman terminated as counsel for plaintiff US Bank as Trustee Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/4/2018. (Bollbach, Jean)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Jean Elardo shall file a response to U.S. Bank's contentions on or before September 14, 2018.Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/4/2018. (Bollbach, Jean)cm by chambers
|
| Filing 9 Letter MOTION to Intervene and for return of downpayment by Moose & Moon Realty LLC. (Schoer, Gary) |
| Filing 8 Letter of Correction by US Bank (Matthews, Brian) |
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION to Remand to State Court Sua Sponte by US Bank. (Matthews, Brian) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Stipulation and Order by US Bank. (Matthews, Brian) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Patrick Matthews on behalf of US Bank (aty to be noticed) (Matthews, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Letter dtd 7/20/18 from pro se office to pro se RE: this will acknowledge receipt of your civil action (Bollbach, Jean) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Jean Elardo informing the Court of address and phone number. (Cubano, Jazmin) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jean Elardo from Supreme Court of the State of NY, County of Nassau, case number 15-004754. Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 25716 (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
