FTC Solar Capital XXI, LLC v. MJJP Realty, LLC
| FTC Solar Capital XXI, LLC |
| MJJP Realty, LLC |
| 2:2018cv04237 |
| July 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Denis R Hurley |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by FTC Solar Capital XXI, LLC. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MJJP Realty, LLC filing fee $400, receipt number 0207-10612212, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by FTC Solar Capital XXI, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Site Lease Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Assignment and Assumption of Lease, #3 Exhibit 3 - Assignment Agreement, #4 Exhibit 4 - Agreement, dated 8/26/16, #5 Exhibit 5 - Letter from FTC Solar's counsel, #6 Exhibit 6 - Memorandum of Lease, #7 Exhibit 7 - Email from Michelle Bassen, dated April 25, 2018, #8 Exhibit 8 - Letter, dated April 30, 2018, #9 Exhibit 9 - Proof of Delivery of April 30, 2018 Letter, #10 Exhibit 10 - Letter, dated May 4, 2018, #11 Exhibit 11 - Proof of Delivery of May 4, 2018 Letter, #12 Exhibit 12 - Email from MJJP's Counsel, #13 Civil Cover Sheet, #14 Rule 26(a) Disclosure) (Picca, Dominic) Modified on 7/31/2018 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
