Secard v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Glen Secard |
| Hogan Lovell US LLP, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Shapiro, Dicaro & Barak, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank and Reed Smith LLP |
| 2:2018cv04384 |
| August 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Hogan Lovell US LLP. (Attachments: #1 Ex 1 Letter requesting voluntary dismissal of all claims again the Hogan Lovells Defendants, #2 Certificate of Service) (Muir, Robin) |
| Filing 13 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Hogan Lovell US LLP. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Muir, Robin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Robin L Muir on behalf of Hogan Lovell US LLP (aty to be noticed) (Muir, Robin) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hogan Lovell US LLP (Fried, Lisa) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa Fried on behalf of Hogan Lovell US LLP (aty to be noticed) (Fried, Lisa) |
| Filing 9 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Shapiro, Dicaro & Barak, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Affidavit of Service) (Dicaro, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John A. Dicaro on behalf of Shapiro, Dicaro & Barak, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Dicaro, John) |
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Reed Smith LLP(John Scalzo), Reed Smith LLP(Johnathen Young), Wells Fargo Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2015 Order of Dismissal, #2 Exhibit 2015 Judgment, #3 Exhibit 2015 Order dismissing appeal) (Pierre, Zalika) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Zalika Pierre on behalf of Reed Smith LLP(John Scalzo), Reed Smith LLP(Johnathen Young), Wells Fargo Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Pierre, Zalika) |
| Filing 5 Letter from J. Grady to Glen Secard dated 8/3/2018 Re: THIS LETTER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF YOUR CIVIL ACTION(S). DOCKET NUMBER(S) AND JUDGE(S) HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED AS INDICATED ABOVE. (Valle, Christine) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case indicated on the civil cover sheet in case 18-CV-4384(JS)(ARL) (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Glen Secard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landow, Concetta) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 25828 (Landow, Concetta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
