Niola et. al. v. Delila Inc. et. al.
| Milton Niola and Leonidas Teneganay |
| Tom Dushaj, Leo Ulaj, Delila Inc. and Delila Inc. doing business as La Villetta |
| 2:2018cv04421 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Arthur D Spatt |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Email Notification Test - DO NOT REPLY. (Coleman, Laurie) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Delila Inc., Tom Dushaj, Leo Ulaj. (Shenker, Brian) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Delila Inc., Tom Dushaj, Leo Ulaj (Shenker, Brian) |
Electronic ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants. The Defendants shall file a responsive pleading no later than 9/14/2018. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 8/28/2018. (Kanellopoulos, Paul)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, /Stipulation by Delila Inc., Tom Dushaj, Leo Ulaj. (Shenker, Brian) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Milton Niola, Leonidas Teneganay. Tom Dushaj served on 8/8/2018, answer due 8/29/2018. (Marquez, Lillian) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Milton Niola, Leonidas Teneganay. Leo Ulaj served on 8/8/2018, answer due 8/29/2018. (Marquez, Lillian) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Milton Niola, Leonidas Teneganay. Delila Inc. served on 8/8/2018, answer due 8/29/2018. (Marquez, Lillian) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lillian Marie Marquez on behalf of Milton Niola, Leonidas Teneganay (notification declined or already on case) (Marquez, Lillian) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Delila Inc., Tom Dushaj, Leo Ulaj. (Attachments: #1 Summons-Leo Ulaj, #2 Summons-Tom Dushaj) (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Delila Inc., Tom Dushaj, Leo Ulaj filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10635520 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Milton Niola, Leonidas Teneganay. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Pechman, Louis) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Arthur D. Spatt and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
