Shah v. Liston et al
Plaintiff: Sunita Shah
Defendant: Detective John Liston, Police Officer Andrew Martone, Officers Jane Doe 1-2, Officers John Doe 1-2 and The County Of Nassau
Case Number: 2:2018cv04625
Filed: August 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: A Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 10/24/2018 at 2:00 PM before Judge Joan M. Azrack in Courtroom 920 of the Long Island Courthouse. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 10/10/2018. (Posillico, Lauren)
October 3, 2018 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint by John Liston, Andrew Martone, The County Of Nassau. (Reissman, Ralph)
October 3, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Ralph J. Reissman on behalf of John Liston, Andrew Martone, The County Of Nassau (aty to be noticed) (Reissman, Ralph)
August 29, 2018 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sunita Shah. The County Of Nassau served on 8/28/2018, answer due 9/18/2018. (Torczyner, Neil)
August 29, 2018 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sunita Shah. Andrew Martone served on 8/28/2018, answer due 9/18/2018. (Torczyner, Neil)
August 29, 2018 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sunita Shah. John Liston served on 8/28/2018, answer due 9/18/2018. (Torczyner, Neil)
August 23, 2018 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to The County Of Nassau. (Ortiz, Grisel)
August 23, 2018 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Andrew Martone. (Ortiz, Grisel)
August 23, 2018 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to John Liston. (Ortiz, Grisel)
August 22, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Neil S. Torczyner on behalf of Sunita Shah (notification declined or already on case) (Torczyner, Neil)
August 22, 2018 Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Sunita Shah (Harfenist, Steven)
August 22, 2018 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Sunita Shah (Harfenist, Steven)
August 22, 2018 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Sunita Shah (Harfenist, Steven)
August 21, 2018 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
August 21, 2018 Proposed summonses are rejected; the section that reads "The answer or motion must be served on plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are:" has not be completed; additionally, the caption on each summons does not match the caption of the complaint; also, the date on each summons is incorrect as it is added by the Clerk's Office as of the date of issuance; the Clerk's Office cannot issue the summonses. Counsel is advised to submit completed proposed summonses in PDF fillable format using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna)
August 21, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
August 16, 2018 FILING FEE: $400, receipt number 0207-10661560 (Rodin, Deanna)
August 16, 2018 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
August 16, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Sunita Shah. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Rodin, Deanna)
August 16, 2018 The case of Shah v. Liston et al, has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. The case number is 18cv4625. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within seven (7) days. Select the event (Civil Case Filing Fee) and pay online. (Rodin, Deanna)
August 16, 2018 Incorrect Document Entry Information; Due to technical difficulties while opening the case, docket entry #1, complaint with attachments, were emailed to and entered by the Clerk's office. (Rodin, Deanna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shah v. Liston et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sunita Shah
Represented By: Steven J. Harfenist
Represented By: Neil S. Torczyner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective John Liston
Represented By: Ralph J. Reissman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer Andrew Martone
Represented By: Ralph J. Reissman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officers Jane Doe 1-2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officers John Doe 1-2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The County Of Nassau
Represented By: Ralph J. Reissman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?