Epstein v. Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc. et al
| Leslie Epstein |
| Precision Care Software, Inc. and Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv04751 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joseph F Bianco |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc., Precision Care Software, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of service) (Youngwirth, Brooke)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , move or otherwise respond by Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc., Precision Care Software, Inc.. (Youngwirth, Brooke)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Brooke Dana Youngwirth on behalf of Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc., Precision Care Software, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Youngwirth, Brooke)
|
|
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc. and Precision Care Software, Inc. time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 10/8/2018. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 10/1/2018. (Demosthenous, Dina)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leslie Epstein. Precision Care Software, Inc. served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018. (Katz, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leslie Epstein. Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc. served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018. (Katz, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc., Precision Care Software, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Precision Care Software, Inc.) (Rodin, Deanna)
|
|
Filing 6
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
|
|
Filing 5
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons. by Leslie Epstein (Katz, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 3
Proposed Summons. by Leslie Epstein (Katz, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet.. by Leslie Epstein (Katz, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc., Precision Care Software, Inc. filing fee $400, receipt number 0207-10675698, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No, filed by Leslie Epstein. (Katz, Kenneth) Modified on 8/22/2018 (Rodin, Deanna).
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Joseph F. Bianco and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
