North Shore Linen, Inc. v. Carotenuto
North Shore Linen, Inc. |
President Louis Mark Carotenuto and Louis Carotenuto |
2:2018cv04944 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Denis R Hurley |
Steven I Locke |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File: The application is granted on consent and the proposed revised briefing schedule is So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 10/24/2018. (Gapinski, Michele) |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration by North Shore Linen, Inc.. (Newberger, Netanel) |
ORDER re [7, 8, 11]:: Plaintiff's application for a temporary stay is granted. See Burgos v. Northeast Logistics Inc., 2016 WL 899264 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2016). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the arbitration proceedings initiated by Defendant are hereby temporarily stayed while the Court resolves Defendant's motion to dismiss. The parties are directed to comply with the briefing schedule set by the Court on September 18, 2018. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 10/16/2018. (Gapinski, Michele) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Louis Carotenuto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Jarvis, Kevin) |
Filing 11 Letter to Judge Hurley in further support of Plaintiff's request for temporary stay of arbitration by North Shore Linen, Inc. (Newberger, Netanel) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Mark E. Belland, Esquire Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-10808804. by Louis Carotenuto. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 admission to practice pro hac vice) (Jarvis, Kevin) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice David F. Watkins, Jr., Esquire Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-10808459. by Louis Carotenuto. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice) (Jarvis, Kevin) |
ORDER re [7, 8] : The Court will treat Plaintiff's letter as a motion for a stay. To the extent the parties wish to supplement the arguments made in their letters, they should do so on or before October 10, 2018. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 10/1/2018. (Gapinski, Michele) |
Filing 8 REPLY in Opposition re #7 Letter in Opposition to Plaintiff's September 23, 2018 letter seeking to stay arbitration proceedings filed by Louis Carotenuto. (Jarvis, Kevin) |
Filing 7 Letter to Judge Hurley requesting temporary stay of arbitration by North Shore Linen, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Newberger, Netanel) |
ORDER re [5, 6] : The Court waives its requirement for a pre-motion conference and sets the following briefing schedule for the proposed motion: defendant shall serve, but not file, moving papers on or before October 10, 2018; plaintiff shall serve, but not file, opposing papers on or before October 31, 2018; defendant shall serve reply papers, if any, and file all papers with the Court, including a courtesy copy for Chambers, on or before November 12, 2018. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 9/18/2018. (Gapinski, Michele) |
Filing 6 Letter in Opposition to Defendant's Letter Requesting a Pre-Motion Conference by North Shore Linen, Inc. (Newberger, Netanel) |
Filing 5 Letter Requesting a Pre-Motion Conference by Louis Carotenuto (Jarvis, Kevin) |
Filing 4 Letter Requesting a Pre-Motion Conference by Louis Carotenuto (Watkins, David) |
Incorrect Document/Entry Information re Document #4 . The document was filed using the wrong credentials. Please disregard. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Case Assigned to Judge Denis R. Hurley and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 8/31/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/31/2018: #1 Additional Quality Control Check Sheet) (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Louis Carotenuto from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, Case Number 610377/2018. Was the Disclosure Statement on the Civil Cover Sheet completed - No ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10694761) (Attachments: #1 Notice to Adverse Party, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Certificate of Service) (Jarvis, Kevin) Modified on 8/31/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.