Ounis v. Dashub, LLC
Yacine Ounis |
Dashub, LLC |
2:2018cv05064 |
September 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joanna Seybert |
A Kathleen Tomlinson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Yacine Ounis. Dashub, LLC served on 10/11/2018, answer due 11/1/2018. (Herrington, Brian) |
|
|
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-10815031. by Yacine Ounis. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit ISO PHV Motion, #2 Exhibit MS Cert. of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit TN Cert. of Good Standing) (Herrington, Brian) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint (Filed As A Matter Of Course Pursuant To FRCP 15(a)(1)(A)) against Dashub, LLC, filed by Yacine Ounis. (Schlanger, Daniel) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Dashub, LLC. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dashub, LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10710847 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Yacine Ounis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for Dashub, LLC) (Rothfarb, Evan) |
Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ounis v. Dashub, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dashub, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Yacine Ounis | |
Represented By: | Evan Stone Rothfarb |
Represented By: | Daniel Adam Schlanger |
Represented By: | Brian K. Herrington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.