Greuner Medical, PC v. Anthem Life & Disability Insurance Company
| Greuner Medical, PC |
| Anthem Life & Disability Insurance Company, Community Insurance Company and Community Insurance Company doing business as Anthem Life & Disability Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv05073 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Gary R Brown |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Greuner Medical, PC. (Kearns, Brendan) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The application is granted in its entirety. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown on 9/17/2018. c/ecf (Meehan, James)
|
| Filing 5 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Complaint, With Consent by Anthem Life & Disability Insurance Company. (O'Gara, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brendan J Kearns on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Kearns, Brendan) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Anthem Life & Disability Insurance Company from Queens County Supreme Court, case number 711667/2018. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0207-10712752) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (O'Gara, Patrick) Modified on 9/10/2018 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
