Delmoral v. Arstrat, LLC
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Delmoral
Defendant: Arstrat, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv05282
Filed: September 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Referring Judge: A Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2018 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Arstrat, LLC. (Corwin, Matthew)
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Arstrat, LLC answer due 11/5/2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 10/24/2018. (Ryan, Mary)
October 23, 2018 Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Arstrat, LLC. (Corwin, Matthew)
October 23, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew B Corwin on behalf of Arstrat, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Corwin, Matthew)
September 20, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Arstrat, LLC. (Rodin, Deanna)
September 20, 2018 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
September 20, 2018 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
September 20, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
September 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arstrat, LLC filing fee $400, receipt number 0207-10740682, filed by Jeffrey Delmoral. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kidd, Novlette) Modified on 9/20/2018 (Rodin, Deanna).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Delmoral v. Arstrat, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Delmoral
Represented By: Novlette Rosemarie Kidd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arstrat, LLC
Represented By: Matthew B Corwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?