Varotta v. Best Buy Co. of Minnesota
| Benedetto Varotta |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Co. of Minnesota |
| 2:2018cv05626 |
| October 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Denis R Hurley |
| Steven I Locke |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by Benedetto Varotta. (Katz, Harry) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Harry I. Katz on behalf of Benedetto Varotta (notification declined or already on case) (Katz, Harry) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Harry I. Katz on behalf of Benedetto Varotta (aty to be noticed) (Katz, Harry) |
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Best Buy Co. of Minnesota (Levine, Mitchell) Modified on 10/11/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Denis R. Hurley and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 10/11/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/11/2018: #1 Additional Quality Control Check Sheet) (Flanagan, Doreen). |
| NOTICE - The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit corrected Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Best Buy Co. of Minnesota (Levine, Mitchell) Modified on 10/11/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). Modified on 10/11/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Best Buy Co. of Minnesota identifying Corporate Parent Best Buy Co., Inc. for Best Buy Co. of Minnesota. (Levine, Mitchell) Modified on 10/11/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants Best Buy Co. of Minnesota from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, Case Number 609684/2018. Was the Disclosure Statement on the Civil Cover Sheet completed - No. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-10801952) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Levine, Mitchell) Modified on 10/11/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
