Nocera v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
| Gregory Nocera |
| Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv05764 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. answer due 11/23/2018. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 11/13/2018. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.. (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Account Control Technology Holdings, Inc. for Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.. (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-10836931 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Gregory Nocera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Kidd, Novlette) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nocera v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Brady Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregory Nocera | |
| Represented By: | Novlette Rosemarie Kidd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
