Otter Products, LLC v. Blue Point Solutions NY LLC et al
Otter Products, LLC |
Unknown Entities 1-10, Yosef Yossi Zak-Likowski, John Does 1-10, Matkal LLC and Blue Point Solutions NY LLC |
2:2018cv05969 |
October 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joseph F Bianco |
Gary R Brown |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall have until, and including, December 26, 2018, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown on 12/7/2018. c/ecf (Gilpin, Daniel) |
Filing 9 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, to December 26, 2018 by Blue Point Solutions NY LLC, Matkal LLC, Yosef Yossi Zak-Likowski. (Merten, Andrew) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew P. Merten on behalf of Blue Point Solutions NY LLC, Matkal LLC, Yosef Yossi Zak-Likowski (aty to be noticed) (Merten, Andrew) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address / Firm / Email (Lee, Walter-Michael) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Otter Products, LLC. Blue Point Solutions NY LLC served on 11/4/2018, answer due 11/26/2018; Matkal LLC served on 11/4/2018, answer due 11/26/2018; Yosef Yossi Zak-Likowski served on 11/4/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. (Lee, Walter-Michael) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Blue Point Solutions NY LLC, Matkal LLC, Yosef Yossi Zak-Likowski. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 4 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Trademark. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Otter Products, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Rodin, Deanna) |
FILING FEE: $400, receipt number ANYEDC-10872087 (Rodin, Deanna) |
Case Assigned to Judge Joseph F. Bianco and Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Incorrect Document Entry Information; Due to technical difficulties initiating documents were emailed by plaintiff's attorney and filed by the Clerk's Office. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.