Vazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Luis Vazquez |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2018cv06643 |
November 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joseph F Bianco |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert B. Kambic on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (aty to be noticed) (Kambic, Robert) |
Filing 5 Letter dtd 11/26/18 from pro se office to Pro Se RE: this will acknowledge receipt of your civil action (Bollbach, Jean) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs motion to proceed informa pauperis is granted, and the parties are directed to adhere to the policies set forth below. Because plaintiff proceeds prose, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) must be filed no later than April 19, 2019. Plaintiffs response and/or cross-motion must be filed no later than June 18, 2019. Defendant shall file reply papers, if any, no later than July 9, 2019. Plaintiff shall file reply papers, if any, no later than July 30, 2019. No extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 11/26/2018. (Bollbach, Jean)cm by chambers |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luis Vazquez. (Cox, Dwayne) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Luis Vazquez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Luis Vazquez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
Represented By: | Robert B. Kambic |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.