ISS Marine Services Inc. v. Sherwood Lumber Company
ISS Marine Services Inc. and ISS Marine Services Inc. doing business as Inchcape Shipping Services |
Sherwood Lumber Company |
2:2018cv06790 |
November 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joan M Azrack |
Arlene R Lindsay |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held on 3/13/2019 at 9:15 AM before Judge Azrack in Courtroom 920 of the Long Island Courthouse. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 1/25/2019. (Posillico, Lauren) |
Filing 9 Defendant Sherwood Lumber Company's ANSWER to Complaint of ISS Marine Services Inc. d/b/a Inchcape Shipping Services by All Defendants. (Cavaliere, Melissa) |
ORDER re #8 : The time for Sherwood Lumber Company to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to and including January 23, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 1/4/2019. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert) |
Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer until January 23, 2019 by Sherwood Lumber Company. (Cavaliere, Melissa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa A. Cavaliere on behalf of Sherwood Lumber Company (aty to be noticed) (Cavaliere, Melissa) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ISS Marine Services Inc.. Sherwood Lumber Company served on 12/12/2018, answer due 1/2/2019. (Patzelt-Russo, Melissa) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sherwood Lumber Company. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by ISS Marine Services Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sherwood Lumber Company Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by ISS Marine Services Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E) (Rodin, Deanna) |
FILING FEE: $400, receipt number ANYEDC-10979874 (Rodin, Deanna) |
Incorrect Document Entry Information. Due to technical difficulties while opening the case, initiating documents were e-mailed to and filed by the Clerk's Office staff. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.