Long Island Neurological Associates, P.C. v. 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund
Long Island Neurological Associates, P.C. |
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund and 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund |
2:2018cv06829 |
November 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joan M Azrack |
Gary R Brown |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Joan M. Azrack for Civil Cause for Initial Conference held on 1/10/2019. Appearances: For Plaintiff - Nan Geist Faber; For Defendant - Jennifer Weekley; Case called. Counsel present for all sides. Briefing schedule set: Moving papers served by: 3/7/2019, Response: 4/18/2019, Reply: 5/2/2019; Moving party is responsible for filing the fully briefed motion on ECF and providing courtesy copies to Chambers. (Cubano, Jazmin) |
Filing 7 Letter Requesting Consent to File an Amended Complaint and to Conduct Discovery Proceedings by Long Island Neurological Associates, P.C. (Faber, Nan) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held on 1/10/2019 at 11:30 AM before Judge Azrack in Courtroom 920 of the Long Island Courthouse. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 12/18/2018. (Posillico, Lauren) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund. (Weekley, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. by 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund (Weekley, Jennifer) |
Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
A Civil Cover Sheet was not filed; the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to submit the Civil Cover Sheet using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION re #1 Notice of Removal, Declaration of Service by 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund (Weekley, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund from Supreme Court of New York Nassau County, case number 614347/2018. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYEDC-10996645) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Weekley, Jennifer) Modified on 12/6/2018 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.