Lydon v. Security Officer
Plaintiff: Richard T. Lydon
Defendant: Security Officer
Case Number: 2:2018cv07304
Filed: December 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bianco
Referring Judge: Steven I Locke
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2019 Filing 10 Letter from Pro Se Dept. to Richard T. Lyndon dated February 7, 2019 returning the enclosed documents without docketing or consideration as this Court cannot act on your submission. To the extend that it is your intent to challenge your state conviction, please complete and return the enclosed form for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Cubano, Jazmin)
January 16, 2019 Filing 9 Letter from Richard Lyndon dated January 10, 2019 re case. (Cubano, Jazmin)
January 14, 2019 Filing 8 Letter from Pro Se Dept. to Richard Lyndon dated January 14, 2019 in response to #7 Letter; The appropriate packet for Pro Bono Application is enclosed. (Cubano, Jazmin)
January 8, 2019 Filing 7 Letter from Richard Lyndon dated January 2, 2019 requesting Pro Bono Application. (Cubano, Jazmin)
January 7, 2019 Filing 6 Supplemental MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard T. Lydon. (Bollbach, Jean)
January 2, 2019 Filing 5 Letter dtd 1/2/19 from pro se office to pro se RE: this letter acknowledges receipt of your civil action (Bollbach, Jean)
December 26, 2018 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne)
December 21, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. re: #1 Complaint. The papers are deficient as your IFP application does not contain enough information for the Court to consider your request. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Application) (Cox, Dwayne)
December 21, 2018 Filing 2 Prisoner Authorization (Cox, Dwayne)
December 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Security Officer Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Richard T. Lydon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lydon v. Security Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Security Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard T. Lydon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?