Musante v. Forster & Garbus, LLP et. al.
Jennifer Musante |
Mark A. Garbus, Ronald Forster and Forster & Garbus, LLP |
2:2019cv00440 |
January 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Sandra J Feuerstein |
Arlene R Lindsay |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Letter to Hon. Raymond J. Dearie advising of the pending motion to consolidate actions by Forster & Garbus, LLP (Arleo, Robert) |
Filing 10 Letter as cover to Defendants' motion to consolidate actions by Forster & Garbus, LLP (Arleo, Robert) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants. (Arleo, Robert) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Arleo on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Arleo, Robert) |
Electronic ORDER: The initial conference scheduled to be held before me on 5/21/19 is ADVANCED to 4/16/19 at 11:15 a.m. in Courtroom 1010 of the Central Islip Courthouse. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/19/2019. (Disbrow, Sandra) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference has been scheduled for 5/21/2019; SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 1/24/2019. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ronald Forster, Forster & Garbus, LLP, Mark A. Garbus. (Attachments: #1 Summons-Mark A. Garbus, #2 Summons-Ronald Forster) (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Incorrect Case Entry Information. Deleted and re-entered Defendants. Defendants, as initially entered, did not conform to the Complaint. Deleted Document Entry No. 3 and re-entered as against all Defendants. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Case Assigned to Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Ronald Forster, Forster & Garbus, LLP, Mark A. Garbus Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Jennifer Musante. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Collection Letter) (Flanagan, Doreen) |
FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number ANYEDC-11126241 (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Jennifer Musante (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons) (Pashkin, Mitchell) |
Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Jennifer Musante (Pashkin, Mitchell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.