Parabit Systems, Inc. v. Synergistics, Inc. et al
| Parabit Systems, Inc. |
| IML Security, Synergistics, Inc., Marc Seidenberg, Island Master Locksmith Inc., Gregory I. Goldman, Millenium Group, Inc., Steven R. London, John Does I-III and Cathy T. Goldman |
| 2:2019cv00888 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 34
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parabit Systems, Inc.. IML Security served on 4/1/2019, answer due 4/22/2019. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 33
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parabit Systems, Inc.. Island Master Locksmith Inc. served on 4/1/2019, answer due 4/22/2019. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 32
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parabit Systems, Inc.. Marc Seidenberg served on 4/1/2019, answer due 4/22/2019. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
ORDER denying #31 Motion to Strike. The promotion conference is waived. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/8/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
|
Filing 31
Letter MOTION to Strike #29 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative for Failure to State a Claim or to deny the motion in its entirety by Parabit Systems, Inc.. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 30
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Status Conference is set for 4/22/2019 at 5:00 PM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/5/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
|
ORDER denying in part #29 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. That portion of the motion to dismiss challenging personal jurisdiction is denied. The motion is mainly focused on the adequacy of allegations of personal jurisdiction in the complaint, but plaintiff has no obligation under Rule 8 to plead any allegations pertaining to personal jurisdiction, and so a complaint cannot inadequately allege the basis for personal jurisdiction. To the extent defendants' motion challenges whether there are fact sufficient to support personal jurisdiction dehors the complaint, defendants have merely made allegations in their brief, but have submitted no affidavits or other evidence to support those statements. Although plaintiff has the burden of proving personal jurisdiction when it is properly challenged, defendants had the burden of going forward to show at least a colorable basis for challenging personal jurisdiction, and unsupported statements in a brief do not do that. With regard to the remainder of the motion, plaintiff may want to consider filing an amended complaint that satisfies those issues. There does appear to be a "lumping" of defendants problem, and other than describing that defendants' product achieves the same end function as plaintiff's, the Court, at least at this stage, is not sure what it is about defendants' product that constitutes infringement. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/5/2019. (Cogan, Brian)
|
|
Case Reassigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo by random assignment. Judge Joan M. Azrack, Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Mahoney, Brenna)
|
|
Filing 29
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative for Failure to State a Claim by Cathy T. Goldman, Gregory I. Goldman, Millenium Group, Inc., Synergistics, Inc.. (Lecusay, Kathryn)
|
|
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #28 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The time for defendants Cathy T. Goldman and Gregory I. Goldman to respond to the Complaint is extended to 4/3/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown on 3/21/2019. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda)
|
|
Filing 28
Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Cathy T. Goldman, Gregory I. Goldman, Millenium Group, Inc., Synergistics, Inc.. (Lecusay, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 27
NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Lecusay on behalf of Cathy T. Goldman, Gregory I. Goldman, Millenium Group, Inc., Synergistics, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Lecusay, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 26
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parabit Systems, Inc.. Cathy T. Goldman served on 2/27/2019, answer due 3/20/2019. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 25
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parabit Systems, Inc.. Gregory I. Goldman served on 2/27/2019, answer due 3/20/2019. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 24
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parabit Systems, Inc.. Millenium Group, Inc. served on 2/27/2019, answer due 3/20/2019. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 23
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parabit Systems, Inc.. Synergistics, Inc. served on 2/27/2019, answer due 3/20/2019. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 22
Summons Issued as to John Does I-III. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 21
Summons Issued as to Marc Seidenberg. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 20
Summons Issued as to Steven R. London. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 19
Summons Issued as to Cathy T. Goldman. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 18
Summons Issued as to Gregory I. Goldman. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 17
Summons Issued as to IML Security. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 16
Summons Issued as to Island Master Locksmith Inc.. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 15
Summons Issued as to Millenium Group, Inc.. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 14
Summons Issued as to Synergistics, Inc.. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
PATENT PILOT REASSIGNMENT ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case from the patent pilot wheel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 2/15/2019. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
|
|
CASE REASSIGNED INTO PATENT PILOT PROGRAM. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay no longer assigned to case (Corsini, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 13
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 12
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 11
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 10
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 9
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 8
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 7
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 6
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Parabit Systems, Inc. (Rando, Robert)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Rodin, Deanna)
|
|
Filing 3
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
|
|
Filing 2
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11199885 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Parabit Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 Proposed Summons, #9 Proposed Summons, #10 Proposed Summons, #11 Exhibit A, #12 Exhibit B, #13 Exhibit C, #14 Report on Filing Patent Action) (Rando, Robert)
|
|
This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Rodin, Deanna)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
|
|
Proposed summonses are rejected; the summonses contain headers from another case; the Clerk's Office cannot issue the summonses. Counsel is advised to submit completed proposed summonses without the header using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
