Feinstein v. County Of Nassau et al
Michael Aron Feinstein |
County Of Nassau, County of Nassau Police Officer John/Jane Does #1-10, County of Nassau Assistant District Attorney John/Jane Does #1-10, County of Nassau Police Officer Daniel Powers, County of Nassau District Attorney Madeline Singas, County of Nassau Police Officer Steven Loesch, County of Nassau Police Officer Anthony Rosselli and County of Nassau Police Department |
2:2019cv01438 |
March 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County Of Nassau, County of Nassau Assistant District Attorney John/Jane Does #1-10, County of Nassau District Attorney Madeline Singas, County of Nassau Police Department, County of Nassau Police Officer Anthony Rosselli, County of Nassau Police Officer Daniel Powers, County of Nassau Police Officer John/Jane Does #1-10, County of Nassau Police Officer Steven Loesch filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11280069 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Michael Aron Feinstein. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 Proposed Summons, #9 Proposed Summons) (Horn, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.