SIPCO, LLC v. Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: SIPCO, LLC
Defendant: Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv02072
Filed: April 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: A Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Filing 17 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Tirado, Chelsea)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re #15 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal - Case closed. SO Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 7/2/2019. (Tirado, Chelsea)
July 1, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SIPCO, LLC (Myers, Gregory)
June 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Second Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Napco Security Technologies, Inc. answer due 7/8/2019. PLEASE NOTE: This date will not be further extended. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 6/4/2019. (Ryan, Mary)
June 3, 2019 Filing 13 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Napco Security Technologies, Inc.. (Mugno, John)
May 7, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Myers on behalf of SIPCO, LLC (notification declined or already on case) (Myers, Gregory)
May 6, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER granting DE #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee .. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 5/6/2019. (Degennaro, Christopher)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER deferring ruling on DE #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court is in receipt of the motion for leave to appear pro hac vice. Before the Court can rule on this motion, the Court requires that the original certificate(s) of good standing be forwarded to Chambers for review. Counsel is therefore directed to mail the original certificate(s) to the attention of the Hon. A. Kathleen Tomlinson, 100 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, NY 11722. Once the Court has received the original certificate(s), it will rule on the instant motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 5/3/2019. (Degennaro, Christopher)
May 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Napco Security Technologies, Inc. answer due 6/7/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 5/1/2019. (Ryan, Mary)
May 1, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-11437584. by SIPCO, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support with Certificates of Good Standing) (Myers, Gregory)
April 30, 2019 Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Napco Security Technologies, Inc.. (Mugno, John)
April 23, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SIPCO, LLC. Napco Security Technologies, Inc. served on 4/16/2019, answer due 5/7/2019. (McKenna, Thomas)
April 10, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Napco Security Technologies, Inc.. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 10, 2019 Filing 6 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H) (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 10, 2019 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 10, 2019 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 10, 2019 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by SIPCO, LLC (McKenna, Thomas)
April 10, 2019 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by SIPCO, LLC (McKenna, Thomas)
April 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Napco Security Technologies, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11369362 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed - Yes,, filed by SIPCO, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (McKenna, Thomas) Modified on 4/10/2019 (Flanagan, Doreen). (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/10/2019: #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H) (Flanagan, Doreen).
April 10, 2019 A completed Civil Cover Sheet was not filed - Specifically Page 2 of the document; the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to submit the Civil Cover Sheet using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 10, 2019 This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 10, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SIPCO, LLC v. Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SIPCO, LLC
Represented By: Thomas J. McKenna
Represented By: Gregory Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: John R. Mugno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?