Kanarek et al v. Blueshape USA, Inc. et al
| Ross Kanarek and Core SWX, LLC |
| Blueshape Professional Video Power Systems, Blueshape USA, Inc., United Production Services, Inc. and United Production Services, Inc. doing business as Bold Distribution, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02339 |
| April 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Gary R Brown |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to United Production Services, Inc.. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Blueshape Professional Video Power Systems. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Blueshape USA, Inc.. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Core SWX, LLC, Ross Kanarek (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Blueshape Professional Video Power Systems, #2 Proposed Summons United Production Services, Inc.) (Kast, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth Sean Kast on behalf of Core SWX, LLC, Ross Kanarek (aty to be noticed) (Kast, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Incorrect Document Entry Information. Due to technical difficulties while opening the case, initiating documents were e-mailed to and filed by the Clerk's Office staff. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blueshape Professional Video Power Systems, Blueshape USA, Inc., United Production Services, Inc. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Ross Kanarek, Core SWX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Copy of Patent, #3 Exhibit 2 - Blueshape Website Content, #4 Exhibit 3 - Blueshape Description, #5 Exhibit 4- Jan 6 2014 Letter Request, #6 Exhibit 5 - Blueshape Counsel Feb 27 2019, #7 Exhibit 6 - Mar 8 2019 Response Letter) (Rodin, Deanna) |
| FILING FEE: $400, receipt number ANYEDC-11407536 (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
