Garcia v. Kmart Corporation et al
Sarah Garcia |
Sears Holdings Corporation, Kmart Holding Corporation, Kmart Corporation and Kmart Corporation a wholly owned subsidiary of Sears Holdings Corporation doing business as Kmart Store #4871 |
2:2019cv02905 |
May 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joan M Azrack |
A Kathleen Tomlinson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by Sears Holdings Corporation, Kmart Holding Corporation, Kmart Corporation. (Pevzner, Bella) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Kmart Corporation, Kmart Holding Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Pevzner, Bella) |
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' deadline to respond to the complaint is extended to July 12, 2019. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 6/14/2019. (Manzo, Michael) |
Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Kmart Corporation, Kmart Holding Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation. (Pevzner, Bella) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Bella Pevzner on behalf of Kmart Corporation, Kmart Holding Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Pevzner, Bella) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Garcia. Sears Holdings Corporation served on 5/30/2019, answer due 6/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (LaPinta, Anthony) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Garcia. Kmart Holding Corporation served on 5/30/2019, answer due 6/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (LaPinta, Anthony) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Garcia. Kmart Corporation served on 5/30/2019, answer due 6/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (LaPinta, Anthony) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kmart Corporation, Kmart Holding Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11486435 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Sarah Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (LaPinta, Anthony) |
Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.