Hochstrasser v. Meridian Financial Services, Inc. et al
Matthew Hochstrasser |
John Does l-25 and Meridian Financial Services, Inc. |
2:2019cv03034 |
May 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joan M Azrack |
Gary R Brown |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application granted, on consent. The time for defendant Meridian Financial Services, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is extended to 8/13/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown on 7/17/2019. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 9 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, [ON CONSENT] by Meridian Financial Services, Inc.. (Corwin, Matthew) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Application granted, on consent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown on 7/3/2019. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 8 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Meridian Financial Services, Inc.. (Corwin, Matthew) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Application granted, on consent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown on 6/21/2019. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ellen Beth Silverman on behalf of Meridian Financial Services, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Silverman, Ellen) |
Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Meridian Financial Services, Inc.. (Corwin, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew B Corwin on behalf of Meridian Financial Services, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Corwin, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Meridian Financial Services, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does l-25, Meridian Financial Services, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11503420 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Matthew Hochstrasser. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Mittelman, Dov) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.