Panarese et al v. Capri Blue LLC
Dominick Martin and John Panarese |
Capri Blue LLC and Spring Thymes Holdings LLC |
2:2019cv03169 |
May 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Peggy Kuo |
Roslynn R Mauskopf |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for defendant Spring Thymes Holdings LLC., to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to August 15, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 7/17/2019. (Riquelme, Claudia) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Amended Complaint filed by Dominick Martin, John Panarese. (Browder, Jacqueline) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer E. Sherven on behalf of Spring Thymes Holdings LLC (aty to be noticed) (Sherven, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Erika Hannah Rosenblum on behalf of Spring Thymes Holdings LLC (notification declined or already on case) (Rosenblum, Erika) |
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE: Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file a response to defendant's #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Amended Complaint, if any, by July 22, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 7/16/2019. (Riquelme, Claudia) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Amended Complaint by Spring Thymes Holdings LLC. (Rosenblum, Erika) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Spring Thymes Holdings LLC. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT John Panarese and Dominick Martin against Spring Thymes Holdings LLC, filed by John Panarese, Dominick Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Browder, Jacqueline) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Capri Blue LLC. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Case Assigned to Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT John Panarese and Dominick Martin against Capri Blue LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11520923 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by John Panarese, Dominick Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Browder, Jacqueline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.