Chapman v. Nassau County et al
Plaintiff: Duane Chapman
Defendant: Madaline Singas, Det. Ingram, Nassau County and Detective Ryan Fais
Case Number: 2:2019cv04592
Filed: August 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Referring Judge: A Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 Electronic Index to Record on Appeal sent to US Court of Appeals. #10 Notice of Appeal Documents are available via Pacer. For docket entries without a hyperlink or for documents under seal, contact the court and we'll arrange for the document(s) to be made available to you. (McGee, Mary Ann)
September 6, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Clerk's Judgment, #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order Dismissing Case, by Duane Chapman. No fee paid. IFP denied for purposes of appeal. Please note that although this appeal has been timely filed, the Appellant submits a joint form which includes a motion for an extension of time which is not necessary. (McGee, Mary Ann) Modified on 9/9/2019 to reflect an request for an extension of time to file appeal. (McGee, Mary Ann).
August 26, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of address Letter dated 8/21/19 from Duane E. Chapman, plaintiff pro se. (Guzzi, Roseann)
August 19, 2019 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dated 8/16/19 that this action is dismissed; that leave to amend is denied as futile, See Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000); that pursuant to 28: 1915(a)(3), any appeal would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status isdenied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). ( Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court on 8/16/2019 ) c/m w/appeals pkg. (Guzzi, Roseann)
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted but this action is dismissed. The Court has considered whether to grant plaintiff leave to bring an amended complaint and, for the reasons herein, denies leave to amend as futile. See Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Clerk shall enter judgment, dismissing this case. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(3) that any in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/14/2019. C/M by chambers. (Barrett, C)
August 12, 2019 Filing 6 Prisoner Authorization. The original has been mailed out. (Marziliano, August)
August 9, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Related Case; 16-cv-3772-JFB-AKT (Cox, Dwayne)
August 9, 2019 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne)
August 8, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Authorization (Cox, Dwayne)
August 8, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Duane Chapman. (Cox, Dwayne)
August 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Duane Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit G, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chapman v. Nassau County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Madaline Singas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Det. Ingram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nassau County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Ryan Fais
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duane Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?