Davis v. Reiily et al
| Michael B Davis |
| Beatrix Jenkins, Hermman Israel Fleischman, Esq and Hon. Margaret C. Reiily |
| 2:2019cv04841 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Robert M Levy |
| Roslynn R Mauskopf |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith; that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal; See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); and that judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants. Signed Douglas C. Palmer Clerk of Court by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 9/19/2019. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants, mail a copy of the judgment and this Memorandum and Order to Davis, note the mailing on the docket, and close the case. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/13/2019. (Taronji, Robert)
|
| Filing 5 Letter from Pro Se Dept. to Michael B. Davis dated September 3, 2019 acknowledging receipt to the civil action. (Cubano, Jazmin) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order from 9/18/19 to upon completion of plaintiff's case before this court is resolved to Surrogate's Court, Mineola NY 11501 Index 2015-384657/A by Michael B Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Cox, Dwayne) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/30/2019) (Cox, Dwayne). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael B Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Michael B Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 17, #16 Exhibit 18, #17 Exhibit 19, #18 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
