Weerasinghe v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Shanthi Weerasinghe |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
2:2019cv04848 |
August 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joan M Azrack |
Arlene R Lindsay |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 11/5/2019 at 2:00 PM before Judge Joan M. Azrack in Courtroom 920 of the Long Island Courthouse. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 10/3/2019. (Posillico, Lauren) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint Second Amended by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Weber, A.) |
Filing 10 DECLARATION Plaintiffs Demand for a Jury Trial by Shanthi Weerasinghe (Gelman, Phyllis) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Phyllis Gelman on behalf of Shanthi Weerasinghe (notification declined or already on case) (Gelman, Phyllis) |
Filing 8 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 8/27/2019 (Flanagan, Doreen). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/27/2019: #1 Additional Quality Control Check Sheet) (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Filing 6 DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. re #2 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet, #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Taiwo, Jennifer) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Lynn Taiwo on behalf of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Taiwo, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent MetLife, Inc. for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc.. (Weber, A.) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. (Weber, A.) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County, case number 601325/2016. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-11788590) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (Weber, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.