Doe v. Maier et al
| John Doe |
| Brennan Becker, James Roes 1-25, Gavin Yingling, Cory Maier, Conner Culiver, Timothy Hughes, David Burkhardt and Michael Heckmuller |
| 2:2019cv04954 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Anne Y Shields |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael D. Cassell on behalf of Conner Culiver, Gavin Yingling (aty to be noticed) (Cassell, Michael) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Brennan Becker, David Burkhardt, Conner Culiver, Michael Heckmuller, Timothy Hughes, Cory Maier, Gavin Yingling. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION to Amend/Correct/Supplement Summons by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Proposed Amended Summons, #2 Supplement Rider to Proposed Amended Summons) (Grasso, Thomas) |
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney: Attorney Richard Gonzalez terminated. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 10/17/2019. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
|
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement: The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue the Amended Summons and Rider, in the form attached to Plaintiff's letter dated October 17, 2019, Docket Entry #8 . So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 10/17/2019. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Richard Gonzalez) by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation of Withdrawal) (Gonzalez, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Brennan Becker, David Burkhardt, Conner Culiver, Michael Heckmuller, Timothy Hughes, Cory Maier, Gavin Yingling. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by John Doe (Gonzalez, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case indicated on the civil cover sheet in case number 19cv4954. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $400, receipt number ANYEDC-11804356, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gonzalez, Richard) Modified on 8/30/2019 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
