ExteNet Systems, Inc. v. Village of Flower Hill et. al.
Plaintiff: ExteNet Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Flower Hill Village Board Of Trustees and Village of Flower Hill
Case Number: 2:2019cv05588
Filed: October 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frederic Block
Referring Judge: Steven M Gold
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: Due to a scheduling conflict, the initial conference previously scheduled for December 17, 2019 is adjourned to January 8, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 13D South before the undersigned. Counsel for all parties must attend. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to immediately confirm this conference date and time with defendants' counsel. Adjournment requests will not be considered unless made in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 11/13/2019. (Gillespie, Saudia)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 2:00 p.m. on December 17, 2019 before the undersigned in Courtroom 13-D South. Counsel for all parties must attend. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to immediately confirm this conference date and time with defendants' counsel. Adjournment requests will not be considered unless made in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 11/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Chamber's Individual Rules) (Gillespie, Saudia)
November 1, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Flower Hill Village Board Of Trustees, Village of Flower Hill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Answer - Findings Supporting the Denial of Special Use Permit for a Proposed Wireless Telecommunication Distributed Network within the Incorporated Village of Flower Hill) (Ross, Edward)
October 21, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ExteNet Systems, Inc.. Flower Hill Village Board Of Trustees served on 10/11/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. (Goodhouse, Brendan)
October 21, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ExteNet Systems, Inc.. Village of Flower Hill served on 10/11/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. (Goodhouse, Brendan)
October 18, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Haran C. Rashes on behalf of ExteNet Systems, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Rashes, Haran)
October 3, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Flower Hill Village Board Of Trustees, Village of Flower Hill. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
October 3, 2019 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
October 3, 2019 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
October 2, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
October 2, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND EXPEDITED REVIEW PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7)(B)(v) against Flower Hill Village Board Of Trustees, Village of Flower Hill filing fee $ 400, receipt number BNYEDC-11905761 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by ExteNet Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Goodhouse, Brendan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ExteNet Systems, Inc. v. Village of Flower Hill et. al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flower Hill Village Board Of Trustees
Represented By: Edward Michael Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Village of Flower Hill
Represented By: Edward Michael Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ExteNet Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Brendan Markham Goodhouse
Represented By: Haran C. Rashes
Represented By: Christopher B. Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?