Belfort v. TransUnion
Plaintiff: Marie Belfort
Defendant: TransUnion
Case Number: 2:2019cv05656
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Arlene R Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2019 Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Joan M. Azrack for Civil Cause for Initial Conference Hearing held on 11/6/2019. Appearances: For Plaintiff - Edward Geller; For Defendant - Ron Gilbert; Case called. Counsel present for all sides. A telephone status conference is scheduled for 12/11/2019 at 9:15 AM. Counsel for the plaintiff shall initiate the call and contact Chambers at 631-712-5600 when all parties are on the line. Parties should notify the Court if the case resolves prior to the conference. (Cubano, Jazmin)
November 5, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C. Gilbert, III on behalf of TransUnion (aty to be noticed) (Gilbert, Ronald)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER re #7 : The Motion of Ronald C. Gilbert, III for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the 150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 11/5/2019. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
November 4, 2019 Filing 7 Notice of MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-12008830. by TransUnion. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Ronald C. Gilbert, III In Support Of Motion To Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certification of Supreme Court of Indiana re Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order Granting Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice) (Nicodemus, Camille)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephone Initial Conference is set for 11/6/2019 at 2:30 PM with Judge Joan M. Azrack. Counsel for the plaintiff shall initiate the call and contact Chambers at 631-712-5600 when both parties are on the line. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 10/22/2019. (Posillico, Lauren) Modified on 10/22/2019 to change conference to telephonic (Posillico, Lauren).
October 16, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward B. Geller on behalf of Marie Belfort (notification declined or already on case) (Geller, Edward)
October 10, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative Defenses by TransUnion. (Nicodemus, Camille)
October 8, 2019 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
October 8, 2019 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
October 7, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
October 7, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TransUnion identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for TransUnion. (Nicodemus, Camille)
October 7, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TransUnion from District Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, case number CV-015998-19. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-11919524) Was the Disclosure Statement completed on the Civil Cover Sheet? - Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Summons to Trans Union, #2 Exhibit B- Complaint To Trans Union, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nicodemus, Camille) Modified on 10/8/2019 (Vanderbilt, Evelyn).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Belfort v. TransUnion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marie Belfort
Represented By: Edward B. Geller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TransUnion
Represented By: Camille Renee Nicodemus
Represented By: Ronald C. Gilbert, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?