Schumacher v. Sunrise Senior Living et. al.
| Kris A. Schumacher |
| Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc. and Sunrise Senior Living |
| 2:2019cv05744 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Steven I Locke |
| Joanna Seybert |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7(d). Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7(d)(3). (Credle, Rita) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (Credle, Rita) |
| Filing 7 STATE COURT RECORD received from Judith Pascale, Suffolk County Clerk, Index No. 616539/2019. Since the above mentioned case is E-filed, there are no hard copies of the documents listed on the Civil Court Minutes Report. (Cubano, Jazmin) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Pre-Motion Conference. Pre-Motion Conference set for Fri. 12/20/2019 at 2:00pm in Courtroom 1030 before Judge Joanna Seybert. See attached Notice. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 10/29/2019. (Baran, Charles)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for pre motion conference prior to making a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion by Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc.. (Vergara, Rafael) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sunrise Senior Living, Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc. Certificate Of Service Re Notice Of Removal (Vergara, Rafael) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc. from Supreme Court Of The State Of New York, County Of Suffolk, case number Index No. 616539/2019. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-11934800) Was the Disclosure Statement completed on the Civil Cover Sheet?- Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - SSLMI service documents, #2 Exhibit 2 - SSLSI service documents, #3 Exhibit 3 - Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4 - SSLSI proof of service, #5 Exhibit 5 - SSLMI proof of service, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Vergara, Rafael) Modified on 10/11/2019 (Vanderbilt, Evelyn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
