People Of The State Of New York v. Quinn
| People Of The State Of New York |
| Linee Quinn and Chace Quinn |
| 2:2019cv05746 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Denis R Hurley |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by People Of The State Of New York. (DiVincenzo, Grazia) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Initial Conference set for 2/10/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 830 before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. See Order and Attachment. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 10/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 AYS Rules) (Torres, Jasmine)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Denis R. Hurley and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Incorrect Document Entry Information. The Notice of Removal was filed on behalf of two defendants on two separate cases; counsel filed a separate case for the second defendant and emailed a revised Notice of Removal to reflect one defendant only. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Linee Quinn from Southampton Town Justice Court, case number 17-120648. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYEDC-11935054) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Shinnecock Letter, #3 Exhibit Notice and Demand, #4 Exhibit Order to Counsel, #5 Exhibit Notice and Demand, #6 Exhibit Notice of Application, #7 Exhibit Notice of Motion for Bill of Particulars, #8 Exhibit Consolidated Affirmation in Opposition to Defendants Motion, #9 Exhibit Response to Consolidated Affirmation in Opposition to Defendants Motion, #10 Exhibit Decision of Motion, #11 Exhibit Notice and Demand, #12 Exhibit Order to Counsel, #13 Exhibit Linee Quinn Letter, #14 Exhibit Linee Quinn Ticket, #15 Exhibit Notice of Application, #16 Exhibit Notice of Motion for Bill of Particulars, #17 Exhibit Consolidated Affirmation in Opposition to Defendants Motion, #18 Exhibit Response to Consolidated Affirmation in Opposition to Defendants Motion, #19 Exhibit Decision of Motion) (Troge, Tela) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/16/2019) (Rodin, Deanna). Modified on 10/16/2019 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
