CDS Business Services, Inc. v. H.M.C., Inc. et. al.
| CDS Business Services, Inc. and CDS Business Services, Inc. doing business as Newtek Business Credit |
| H.M.C., Inc. and Kara DiPietro |
| 2:2019cv05759 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| William F Kuntz |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Scott Krakowsky on behalf of Kara DiPietro, H.M.C., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Krakowsky, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Kara DiPietro, H.M.C., Inc.. (Hutcher, Larry) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 10:30 AM on 2/7/2020 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara in Courtroom 324N. All counsel must attend. Plaintiff is directed to notify defendants of this scheduling order at the time defendants makes an appearance with in this matter. Counsel are also directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 2/7/2020. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 11/5/2019. (Manson, Eddie)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CDS Business Services, Inc.. Kara DiPietro served on 10/24/2019, answer due 11/14/2019. (Kirshnitz, Eliot) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CDS Business Services, Inc.. H.M.C., Inc. served on 10/24/2019, answer due 11/14/2019. (Kirshnitz, Eliot) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kara DiPietro, H.M.C., Inc.. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11937144 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by CDS Business Services, Inc. d/b/a Newtek Business Credit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2) (Kirshnitz, Eliot) |
| Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
