Steil v. Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC et al
Jeannie L. Steil |
Darleen Karaszewski, William C. Grossman, PLLC, Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, Cavalry SPV I LLC, William C. Grossman and Mandarich Law Group, LLP |
2:2019cv05839 |
October 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Roslynn R Mauskopf |
James Orenstein |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint, by Mandarich Law Group, LLP. (Rheaume, Jacob) |
Filing 18 AMENDED ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint, by Darleen Karaszewski, Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, William C. Grossman, PLLC. (Rheaume, Jacob) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeannie L. Steil. Cavalry SPV I LLC served on 12/5/2019, answer due 12/26/2019. (Barshay, David) |
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice -- Attorney Jacob A. Rheaume, Esq. is permitted to argue or try this case in whole or in part as counsel or advocate. By December 12, 2019, Mr. Rheaume shall register for ECF. Registration is available online at the EDNY's homepage. Once registered, Mr. Rheaume shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Mr. Rheaume shall also ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerk's Office. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 12/5/2019. (Walker, Anna) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint, by Darleen Karaszewski, Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC. (Rheaume, Jacob) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-12122185. by Darleen Karaszewski, Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC. (Rheaume, Jacob) |
ORDER: In light of plaintiff's amended complaint, #9 , defendants' request for a pre-motion conference is terminated without prejudice to renewal. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/2/2019. (Walchak, David) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeannie L. Steil. William C. Grossman served on 11/19/2019, answer due 12/10/2019. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeannie L. Steil. Mandarich Law Group, LLP served on 11/19/2019, answer due 12/10/2019. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Mandarich Law Group, LLP. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to William C. Grossman, Mandarich Law Group, LLP. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Cavalry SPV I LLC. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Darleen Karaszewski, Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, William C. Grossman, Cavalry SPV I LLC, Mandarich Law Group, LLP, filed by Jeannie L. Steil. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Cavalry, #2 Proposed Summons Grossman, #3 Proposed Summons Mandarich) (Barshay, David) |
ORDER denying #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice -- Stephanie Strickler is an attorney who is admitted to practice in the State of Illinois and who has applied to be admitted pro hac vice on behalf of the defendants in the instant case pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.3(c). See Docket Entry #7 . She is not admitted to practice before this court. For the reasons set forth below, I deny the motion without prejudice to renewal upon a showing that such admission is appropriate under the circumstances. Ms. Strickler practices law in Illinois, where she is a member of the firm Messer Strickler, Ltd. Ms. Strickler has been admitted pro hac vice in at least eight cases in this district since July 2018. See Shimonov v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC, et al., 18-CV-6719 (ENV) (ST); Nunez v. TrueAccord Corp., 19-CV-0583 (AMD) (RML); Zheng v. Mandarich Law Group, LLP, 19-CV-1626 (FB) (RER); Hochhauser v. Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, 19-CV-2468 (ARR) (CLP); Solovyova v. Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, 19-CV-2996 (KAM) (VMS); Felberbaum v. Mandarich Law Group, LLP, 19-CV-4249 (KAM) (VMS); Fritz v. LVNV Funding, LLC, et al., 19-CV-5255 (ENV) (PK); Peragine v. William C. Grossman Law PLLC, 17-CV-5901 (JMA) (AYS). Ms. Strickler has been admitted to appear on behalf of several different clients in these cases. It thus appears that Ms. Strickler regularly engages in the practice of law in this district. Yet by routinely gaining admission pro hac vice rather than taking the steps necessary to join the bar of this court, Ms. Strickler remains immune to much of the disciplinary oversight to which her colleagues are subjected. See Loc. Civ. R. 1.5(b)-(c). This court routinely grants attorneys who practice elsewhere the courtesy of representing clients who find themselves involved in litigation in this court. But "[a]dmission pro hac vice is by definition, at most, admission for a single proceeding." In re Rappaport, 558 F.2d 87, 88 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1977). It is a privilege rather than a right, see Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438, 44142, 99 S.Ct. 698, 58 L.Ed.2d 717 (1979), and one that should not be abused. If Ms. Strickler intends to continue representing defendants Darleen Karaszewski, William C. Grossman, PLLC, and Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, or other clients in this court, she can and should secure the admission to our bar. If, on the other hand, Ms. Strickler can demonstrate that her many applications for admission pro hac vice represent an aberration in her normal practice, and that she does not anticipate making future similar applications on a routine basis, then I will of course grant her the same courtesy that is routinely afforded to out-of-state counsel in their occasional visits to this district. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 11/13/2019. (Walker, Anna) |
Filing 8 Letter MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Darleen Karaszewski, Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, William C. Grossman, PLLC. (Strickler, Stephanie) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-12054118. by Darleen Karaszewski, Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, William C. Grossman, PLLC. (Strickler, Stephanie) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeannie L. Steil. Darleen Karaszewski served on 10/22/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeannie L. Steil. Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC served on 10/22/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Darleen Karaszewski, #2 Summons William C. Grossman, PLLC) (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of Jeannie L. Steil (aty to be noticed) (Barshay, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Darleen Karaszewski, Grossman & Karaszewski, PLLC, William C. Grossman, PLLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11947701 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Jeannie L. Steil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Grossman & Karaszewski, #3 Proposed Summons Karaszewski, #4 Proposed Summons Grossman) (Sanders, Craig) |
Case Assigned to Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.