Freeman v. Hi-Class Pizza, Inc. et. al.
Plaintiff: Scott Freeman
Defendant: Hi-Class Pizza, Inc. and Chahal Corporation
Case Number: 2:2019cv06270
Filed: November 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Peggy Kuo
Referring Judge: Roslynn R Mauskopf
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2019 Filing 8 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, upon consent by Chahal Corporation. (Marcus, Joshua)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for defendant Chahal Corporation to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to January 6, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 12/6/2019. (Riquelme, Claudia)
November 26, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Freeman. Chahal Corporation served on 11/18/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (Solotoff, Darryn)
November 26, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Freeman. Hi-Class Pizza, Inc. served on 11/18/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (Solotoff, Darryn)
November 8, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Darryn G Solotoff on behalf of Scott Freeman (aty to be noticed) (Solotoff, Darryn)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held in this case on February 12, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge, in Courtroom 11C South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. All counsel are required to attend. Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. At least five days before the Conference, the parties must file a completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/pub/PK-discovplan.pdf. Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order on defendants and file proof of service on the docket. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 11/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Discovery Plan) (Riquelme, Claudia)
November 7, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chahal Corporation, Hi-Class Pizza, Inc.. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
November 7, 2019 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
November 7, 2019 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
November 6, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
November 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Scott Freeman against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12017559 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Scott Freeman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Freeman v Hi Class and Chahal, #2 Proposed Summons Hi Class, #3 Proposed Summons Chahal) (Bell, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freeman v. Hi-Class Pizza, Inc. et. al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hi-Class Pizza, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chahal Corporation
Represented By: Joshua A Marcus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Freeman
Represented By: Jonathan Bell
Represented By: Darryn G. Solotoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?