O2Cure Ltd. v. CVD Equipment Corporation
| O2Cure Ltd. |
| CVD Equipment Corporation |
| 2:2019cv06470 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 Order) (Hong, Loan) |
Filing 11
ORDER: As per 44 STIPULATION of Dismissal, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 1/30/2020. (Almonte, Giselle)
|
|
In light of the filing of the dismissal, the initial conference scheduled before the undersigned for March 17th is canceled. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 1/30/2020. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by O2Cure Ltd. Without Prejudice (Mlynar, Theodore) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference with respect to CVD's motion to dismiss the Complaint filed by O2Cure Ltd.. (Mlynar, Theodore) |
|
ORDER denying #7 Motion for Pre Motion Conference. Defendant's motion for a pre-motion conference is denied. Defendant, nevertheless, may proceed with a motion to dismiss. The parties are directed to file a proposed joint briefing schedule for the motion by January 31, 2020. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 1/24/2020. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 1/24/2020. (Craft, Rachel)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CVD Equipment Corporation (Pollack, Stuart) |
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference with respect to CVD's motion to dismiss the Complaint by CVD Equipment Corporation. (Pollack, Stuart) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 11:30 a.m. on March 17, 2020 before the undersigned in Hearing Room N504 in the North Wing. Counsel for all parties must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than March 13th. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 1/15/2020. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CVD Equipment Corporation. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5) (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CVD Equipment Corporation filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12069167 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by O2Cure Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - US9138522 Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - US9827534 Patent, #3 Exhibit 3 - c-VACNTTM, New Nano-to-Macro Material Platform with a Rich Application Potential, #4 Exhibit 4 - Air Powered Artificial Lung and other High Efficiency Fluid, #5 Exhibit 5 - CVD Twitter feed, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Proposed Summons) (Mlynar, Theodore) Modified on 11/18/2019 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: O2Cure Ltd. v. CVD Equipment Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: O2Cure Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Theodore J. Mlynar |
| Represented By: | Eric J. Lobenfeld |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CVD Equipment Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Stuart E. Pollack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
