Segovia v. Sunrise Medical Laboratories, Inc. et al
| Edeline M. Segovia |
| Kathryn Davies, Kathryn Esposito, JOHN AND JANE 1-10 DOE, Company XYZ, Sunrise Medical Laboratories, Inc., Company ABC 1-10, Company ABC and John/Jane Doe |
| 2:2019cv06499 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Including Class Action and Collective Action Allegations) against Company ABC, Company XYZ, Kathryn Davies, John/Jane Doe, Sunrise Medical Laboratories, Inc., filed by Edeline M. Segovia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Sue) (Wang, Heng) |
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The time for Sunrise Medical Laboratories, Inc., and Kathryn Davies to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to and including January 31, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 12/23/2019. (Jacobwitz, Beth)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Bauer on behalf of Kathryn Davies, Sunrise Medical Laboratories, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Bauer, John) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint and Accept Service of the Complaint by Kathryn Davies, Sunrise Medical Laboratories, Inc.. (Capobianco, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kathryn Davies, Sunrise Medical Laboratories, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Incorrect Document Entry Information. Defendants were added to the case incorrectly; docket entry 1 was deleted and re-entered against corrected defendants. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by Edeline M. Segovia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Consent to Sue, #3 Exhibit Litigation Hold Letter) (Rodin, Deanna) Modified on 11/19/2019 (Rodin, Deanna). |
| FILING FEE: $400, receipt number ANYEDC -12073445 (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Edeline M. Segovia (Wang, Heng) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
