Laser v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Linda Laser |
What Cheer III LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., |
2:2019cv06645 |
November 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Lois Bloom |
Steven Tiscione |
Eric N Vitaliano |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person conference will be held at 12:00 p.m. on February 24, 2020 before the undersigned in Hearing Room N504 in the North Wing. The individual plaintiff and a principal with full settlement authority for the defendants must attend the conference with all counsel. Counsel shall submit their respective settlement positions via ex parte electronic filing through the Court's ECF system no later than February 20th. If the case fails to settle during the conference, a discovery schedule will be set by the Court therefore a proposed discovery schedule should NOT be submitted prior to the conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 1/17/2020. (Vasquez, Lea) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Linda Laser. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., waiver sent on 12/2/2019, answer due 1/31/2020. (Solotoff, Darryn) |
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 11/26/2019. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to What Cheer III LLC. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,, What Cheer III LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12099126 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Linda Laser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., #3 Proposed Summons What Cheer III LLC) (Solotoff, Darryn) |
Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.