Genovese v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC et ano.
| Sara Genovese |
| SRA Associates, Inc., Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC, Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC and SRA Associates, Inc. doing business as SRA Associates of New Jersey |
| 2:2019cv06882 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joanna Seybert |
| A Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #10 Amended Complaint. Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC answer due 2/14/2020; Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC answer due 2/14/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 1/29/2020. (Ryan, Mary)
|
| Filing 17 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #10 Amended Complaint by Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC, Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC. (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur Sanders on behalf of Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur Sanders on behalf of Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Sanders, Arthur) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: In light of the filing of the Amended Complaint [DE 10], and the fact that the answers are not yet due from the newly added defendants, the Court is adjourning the Initial Conference from January 28, 2020 to March 3, 2020 at 10 a.m. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 1/24/2020. (Wolf, Deanna)
|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sara Genovese. Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC served on 1/13/2020, answer due 2/3/2020. (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sara Genovese. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC served on 1/6/2020, answer due 1/27/2020. (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC. (Valle, Christine) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC. (Valle, Christine) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC, Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC, filed by Sara Genovese. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for January 28, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson in Courtroom 910 at 100 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York. No later than two business days before the Initial Conference, counsel for the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the court's ECF system, a Joint Proposed Discovery Plan. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for additional details.Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 12/30/2019. (Degennaro, Christopher)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sara Genovese. SRA Associates, Inc. served on 12/19/2019, answer due 1/9/2020. (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SRA Associates, Inc. (Easley, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by SRA Associates, Inc.. (Easley, Aaron) |
|
Filing 5
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for January 28, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson in Courtroom 910 at 100 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York. No later than two business days before the Initial Conference, counsel for the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the court's ECF system, a Joint Proposed Discovery Plan. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for additional details.Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 12/17/2019. (Degennaro, Christopher)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to SRA Associates, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of Sara Genovese (aty to be noticed) (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SRA Associates, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12134560 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Sara Genovese. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
