Windley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Matthew James Windley |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2020cv00361 |
January 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joanna Seybert |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis Canning on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Canning, Dennis) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, Eastern District U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 RIDER for Summons) (Valle, Christine) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the United States Marshal Service is directed to serve the summons and complaint on the United States Attorney forthwith. The parties are directed to adhere to the following policies, based on E.D.N.Y. Administrative Order 2015-15 (Amon, Chief Judge), for expediting disposition of Social Security cases. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/7/2020. (CM to pro se plaintiff) (Florio, Lisa) |
Filing 4 Letter dtd 1/24/2020 from pro se office to pro se RE: THIS LETTER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF YOUR CIVIL ACTION (Bollbach, Jean) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew James Windley. (Cox, Dwayne) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Matthew James Windley. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Windley v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew James Windley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.