Windley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Matthew James Windley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2020cv00361
Filed: January 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis Canning on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Canning, Dennis)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, Eastern District U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 RIDER for Summons) (Valle, Christine)
February 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the United States Marshal Service is directed to serve the summons and complaint on the United States Attorney forthwith. The parties are directed to adhere to the following policies, based on E.D.N.Y. Administrative Order 2015-15 (Amon, Chief Judge), for expediting disposition of Social Security cases. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/7/2020. (CM to pro se plaintiff) (Florio, Lisa)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Letter dtd 1/24/2020 from pro se office to pro se RE: THIS LETTER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF YOUR CIVIL ACTION (Bollbach, Jean)
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew James Windley. (Cox, Dwayne)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Matthew James Windley. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Windley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew James Windley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?