Andresen v. The State University of New York at Suffolk County Community College et al
| KATHLEEN ANDRESEN |
| SHAUN L MCKAY, Suffolk County Community College, Shaun L. McKay and The State University of New York at Suffolk County Community College |
| 2:2020cv00618 |
| February 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| A Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Sex Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant The State University of New York at Suffolk County Community College to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to May 8, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 3/31/2020. (Wolf, Deanna)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Stipulation by The State University of New York at Suffolk County Community College. (Gabor, Hope) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on SCCC on 2/27/2020, filed by Kathleen Andresen. (Stanziale, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Shaun L. McKay, The State University of New York at Suffolk County Community College. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re Case Assigned/Reassigned, Quality Control Check - Summons, #1 Complaint, by Kathleen Andresen (Stanziale, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Incorrect Document Entry Information. Due to technical difficulties while opening the case, initiating documents were e-mailed to and filed by the Clerk's Office staff. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: Did not use the correct Summons form AO 440 Rev 6/12, SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shaun L. McKay, The State University of New York at Suffolk County Community College Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Kathleen Andresen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Notice of Lawsuit, #4 Waiver of Service) (Rodin, Deanna) |
| FILING FEE: $400, receipt number ANYEDC-12337863 (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
