Kim et al v. Synergetic Communication, Inc.
| Keun S Seok and Moses Hyun Sook Kim |
| Synergetic Communication, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00709 |
| February 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Allyne R Ross |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, an Initial Conference is scheduled for 4/28/2020 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Scanlon in Courtroom 13A South. Plaintiffs' counsel is directed to confirm with Defendants' counsel that all necessary participants are aware of this conference. Counsel must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 4/23/2020. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference unless in an emergency. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 3/19/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Synergetic Communication, Inc. (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Synergetic Communication, Inc.. (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur Sanders on behalf of Synergetic Communication, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Moses Hyun Sook Kim, Keun S Seok. Synergetic Communication, Inc. served on 2/11/2020, answer due 3/3/2020. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Synergetic Communication, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of Moses Hyun Sook Kim, Keun S Seok (aty to be noticed) (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Synergetic Communication, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12361878 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Moses Hyun Sook Kim, Keun S Seok. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
